Saturday, April 26, 2014

Rare Earth - the Evolving Drama

This post was originally published May 13, 2011

 

Rare Earth - the Evolving Drama

 
Recent world developments once again surfaced the importance of rare earth commodities. The really tragic rare earth market story is proficiently described in this presentation: Arafura Resources – On Track to Supply Rare Earths To Users Worldwide in 2013 

Another appealing graph is produced by the USGS: Global rare-earth-oxide production trends. 

Analyzing my Blog Stats I have noticed that this entry is very popular with visitors worldwide: Investing in Thorium: a Safe and Green Alternative to Uranium. Thus, I am re-posting my 15 months’ old blog posts (with some 2011 updates) and in the follow-up post I will make some present day summary.

The Rare Earth market is not very prominent as compared to other commodities. However, according to some analysts “it may prove to be the most geo-politically controversial market in the future.” And once again, this is very tightly associated with China. Just yesterday, the Chinese news mediaproudly reported: “China becomes rare earth heavyweight” - China is now the world's largest producer, exporter, and consumer of rare earth resources.

In this blog post I would attempt to briefly outline some issues of rare earth market.
What are the metals? This is a good presentation of Rare Earth from 
Rare Earth Elements

  
This beautiful slide has a good visualization:

   By Wings Enterprises, Inc.
 
Another valuable source is 
Rare Earth Elements by Stephen B. Castor and James B. Hedrick that has very detailed description including world deposits, exploration and mining methods.

The situation with Rare Earth in the USA is analyzed in the 
report prepared by the Molycorp Minerlas, LLC. prepared for Congressional Leaders  in January 2009
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
·                  The global market for rare earths consumed 126,682 metric tons of materials in 2008 and an estimated 113,610 metric tons in 2009. This is expected to increase to 175,618 metric tons in 2014, for a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.1%.
·                  Mechanical and metallurgical applications have the largest share of the market and used 42,765 metric tons of materials in 2008. This is expected to decrease to 36,770 metric tons in 2009 and increase to 56,410 metric tons in 2014, for a CAGR of 8.9%.
·                  Glass and ceramics applications have the second-largest market share, and used 34,730 metric tons in 2008 and an estimated 32,500 metric tons in 2009. This is expected to increase at a CAGR of 8.5% to reach 48,890 metric tons in 2014.
China produces 90- 95% of World Rare Earth Elements (REE) supply. There is one producing North American mine— Mountain Pass in California has been restarted. A very interesting discussion on Rare Earth (including the new developments in Greenland – that will probably will shake the market)  is hosted by Pure Asset Trader -- China's Mission: A Rare Earth Element Monopoly with this citation:


China currently produces 95% of the world’s rare earth output. A very detailed description of China’s resources may be found at the China Mining web-site : “The available REE products encompass bastnaesite, ion type REE ores and monazite. The productive capacity of REE concentrates is as high as 80,000 tons and the output is higher than 50,000 tons. The total smelting capacity of REE ores is over 100,000 tons a year (referring to REE oxides) and the output reaches 40,000~50,000 tons. At present, there are more than 70 hydrometallurgical plants and they produce 300 varieties and 500 specifications of REE products. The purity of a single REE oxide is 99%~99.9% in general and that of batch REE products can be as high as 99.9%~99.999%. The quality of products has come to the relevant national standards and can meet the demands of the customers both from China and abroad.”
Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released a draft plan entitled “Rare Earths Industry Plan in 2009 – 2015” (REIP) – in order to restructure the rare earth industry, eliminating many smaller mining enterprises and leaving the industry with 20 big producers. The REIP would limit China’s annual production to 130,000 to 150,000 tons and restrict exports. The Plan recommends limiting Chinese exports to below 35,000 tons a year, and will prohibit export of yttrium and heavy rare earths dysprosium,  terbium, thullium and lutetium. In September Reuters reported that China's sovereign wealth fund is mulling to launch its own domestic rare earth firm. China Investment Corp (CIC) may do this through Jianyin Investment, its wholly-owned domestic industrial investment arm.

ARAFURA RESOURCES LIMITED  issued a press-release: China further tightens Rare Earth Production and Exports that has some good observations.
Brian Hicks in the WealthyDaily also discusses China’s role and has this illustration:

And I would also recommend reading Rare Earth Elements and The China Factor – Again… from the SeekingAlpha.

Despite optimistic views expressed in the cited above source on the Greenland REE opportunity -  Displacing China as a Rare Earth Producer is No Small Feat – as it is discussed in this video by Dudley Kingsnorth of Industrial Minerals Company of Australia Pty Ltd, an expert in the field of Rare Earth metals. However, latest news reports indicate that there is an upcoming shift in the REE market: China is turning its policy in a direction that may greatly affect the whole world – form providing supplies to the world industries to supplying internal ones. Thus, the new resources may be vital – as the ones claimed by Greenland Minerals and Energy . The company posts on its Web-site this material: World faces hi-tech crunch as China eyes ban on rare metal exports – worth to read.

2011 Update: A thorough analysis in provided in this USGS pamphlet: China’s Rare-Earth Industry
More to come...

Iron Ore in Indonesia: Much Ado About …? – Final Part



THIS POST WAS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED MAY 23, 2011

Iron Ore in Indonesia: Much Ado About …? – Final Part


 
Here I would like to show, that despite strong external demand, internal Indonesian industry may consume a lot of iron ore production. As I mentioned before, Indonesia has 362,564,042 tons of primary iron ore deposits – with projected exploitation for 52 years. In the previous post I showed some data on the available types of ore. Here is what this is intended to be used for.

There is a requirement of 4.5 million tons of primary iron ore (hematite or magnetite) that is needed to meet national crude steel capacity (6.5 mill. tons/year) and national sponge iron production capacity (2.3 mill. tons/year) – thus  amount of primary iron ore that should be supplied to cover the sponge iron shortage will be 6.94 million tons per year.
According to the Ministry of Industry the projections for the steel industry requirements look like this:


Iron sand in Indonesia is used for cement industries. Projections show that the iron sand production lags as compared to demand:
 
Laterite iron ore (limonite) mostly is happening as nickel mines over layer or overburden -- has low iron content; thus it was not utilized yet as raw material for steel industries. However, for the future, major Indonesian producers of nickel (PT. INCO and PT. Antam Tbk) are planning to carry out hydrometallurgy process for the limonite ore which is lower cost in energy as well as capable to treat lower content of nickel in the ore. Another good potential for limonite is the use as coal liquefaction catalyst. This graph shows projections of Indonesia limonite consumption for coal liquefaction.


Thus, there is a good reason to believe that iron ore shall be in high demand internally for the nearest years. Some of investors might be cooled off a bit by the fact that according to the current legislation after five years of operations the iron ore produced should stay in the country and is prohibited from export. The data above shows the internal demand.  Therefore it is very worthwhile to make a conclusion that investments in iron ore in Indonesia are really attractive – both from the international commodity market perspective, and from internal demand.